Advertisement





Phillip Rogaway

Photo Unavailable

Advertisement



Phillip Rogaway's Scorecard:

  • No. of Ratings: 14
  • Average Easiness: 1.6
  • Average Helpfulness: 3.9
  • Average Clarity: 4.0
  • Hotness Total: 0
  • Overall Quality: 3.9
Rating Key:
emoticon smiley
Good Quality
emoticon undecided
Average Quality
emoticon unhappy
Poor Quality
chili pepper
Hot
envelope
Rating Left by a Registered User
flag
Flag This Rating
  • Easiness
  • Helpfulness
  • Clarity
  • Rater Interest
Date Class E H C RI       User Comments  Professors add your rebuttal here
4/2/09 ECS20 3 4 5 4 emoticon smiley flag   My favorite professor so far! I never went to office hours or anything so I don't really know about helpfulness, but he was great at explaining new concepts and made a point of learning to actually think about problems rather than memorizing solutions. He really seems to care about his students, and his delightful nerdiness made the class very fun.
2/26/09 ECS20 1 3 3 3 emoticon_undecided flag   Hardest prof ever, but i guess he backs it up with his MIT doctorate. the HW is near impossible. ridiculously harsh grading practices. for example you get negative points for any guess. some ppl were getting negative test scores! his lectures are clear but go way too fast. evils surprise pop quizzes. he failed half the class.
9/11/07 ECS20 5 5 5 5 emoticon smiley flag   If you are really interested in Math/Computer Science, you will find this Prof. is really smart and, what is more important, his teaching is enjoyable that can makes you love the field even more.
4/11/06 ECS 120 1 4 4 3 emoticon smiley flag   He is a good professor. He knows the material very well, and explains very well, although the material itself are VERY VERY abstract. You defenitly have to work VERY VERY hard in his class to get an A. The Class is based on the curve, so don't panic if you get 10%-20% in homework. Overall VERY VERY tough course, but he is a good instructor.
4/11/06 ECS 20 1 2 2 4 emoticon_unhappy flag   Worst teacher I had during my undergrad work. Unapproachable and ignored student comments (even after soliciting for them).
www8