Advertisement





Cynthia Goh

Advertisement



Cynthia Goh's Scorecard:

  • No. of Ratings: 47
  • Average Easiness: 2.4
  • Average Helpfulness: 2.1
  • Average Clarity: 2.0
  • Hotness Total: 0
  • Overall Quality: 2.1
Rating Key:
emoticon smiley
Good Quality
emoticon undecided
Average Quality
emoticon unhappy
Poor Quality
chili pepper
Hot
envelope
Rating Left by a Registered User
flag
Flag This Rating
  • Easiness
  • Helpfulness
  • Clarity
  • Rater Interest
Date Class E H C RI       User Comments  Professors add your rebuttal here
7/21/06 CHM 1 1 1 1 emoticon_unhappy flag envelope watch out , very biased teacher, if you get on her bad side your marks will be failing without reason. no joke, tends to favour students
7/20/05 CHM139 5 1 1 3 emoticon_unhappy flag   Treats us like we're in kindergarten. She TRIES to make people intersted but asks stupid questions that are completely off topic. '"What's your favorite reaction?"', and that can go on for 30 min. Waste of time. Your better off studying it yourself during lecture time instead of attending.
5/5/05 CHM139 3 2 2 1 emoticon_unhappy flag   I only had Ms. Goh for a short while in 139 but it was not fun at all. She as a person is quite a bad lecturer, although the slides are OK. But in class, she wastes a lot of time on stupid questions posed to the class. ANd the course doesn't follow the textbook well which pissed me off
4/21/05 CHM139 1 1 1 5 emoticon_unhappy flag   SIMPLY HORRIBLE! I hope she reads this and realizes how many people dislike her teaching style. U of T really needs to do something about the quality of professors it has. Wont anyone think about the stydents!!!!
12/8/04 CHM 139 1 1 1 1 emoticon_unhappy flag   Not a good teacher at all. Lecture slides were a waste of my ink and paper. Test did not resemble the text questions at all or examples brought up in class (cause there weren't any!). Brutal test average apparantly due to "lack of comprehension of equilibrium" more like "lack of quality teaching"
w1