posted by: plantman | Please login to reply to this message. | Posted Thursday, Dec 13 at 8:18 AM Thu, Dec 13, 07 at 08:18:50 EST | In my long experience, students who are truly vindictive for no good reason are very rare. When I look at folks I know on rmp, very rarely do I not nod and say, yeah, I can see that. A lot of profs think they're being "challenging" when in fact they just aren't very good at being clear, concise, etc.
The one place I do find problems with student evaluations, whether rmp or university- administered, is that most students do not really understand how academia and universities work. Their comments evince a lack of understanding of basic facts the faculties take for granted. That's our fault for not communicating it more clearly; this is something that probably ought to be covered at new-student orientation.
The other place is that students sometimes have difficulty separating their feelings from an objective evaluation. It's like when your friend says, "That movie sucked!!" Well, maybe the movie was very well done, with good acting, an intelligent script, great direction, lighting, etc. But you just didn't ENJOY it because you never enjoy movies about singing opoosums in Vienna or whatnot.
Okay, you didn't like the class -- it was a very unpleasant subject to study, a lot of work, and didn't crank your scooter. But did the prof perform his/her duties well? Was s/he clear, well-organized, lucid, patient, helpful, honest, fair, etc.? THAT is what you're being asked.
ANY kind of polling, even by the Nielsen or Gallup people, must be taken with a grain of salt. Student evaluations are not 100% reliable, but they're reliable enough. I do not know ANY good profs of my acquaintance who have got 2.6 on rmp. (Though I have seen some I think are crappy get 3.5).
|
|
|